Category Archives: Ski News

Vail Resorts Takes Over PCMR

The big news coming out of little Park City today was the $182.5 million purchase of Park City Mountain Resort by Vail Resorts. Maybe not since the silver bust or at least the 2002 Winter Olympics has Park City, Utah, experienced such national attention.

So where do I start? You’ve all heard the news by now – following the drama that  began in 2011 when Park City failed to renew their lease with Talisker who owns the upper land to the resort, PCMR sued Talisker for failing to uphold what they saw as an implied lease; Vail Resorts then signed a lease with Talisker Land Holdings to rent Canyons for at least $25 million a year, with increases based on inflation (and 42 percent of Vail Resorts’ earnings over $35 million).  They would run Canyons and take over the PCMR lawsuit, and PCMR itself, if VR wins; Judge Harris ruled against PCMR and signed an eviction notice that he subsequently stayed; PCMR announced they will post the $17 million bond to operate the resort for the 2014/15 ski season so that they can appeal and the very next day (today) Vail closed a cash deal to purchase PCMR et al (except for the Powdr Corp. owned Gorgoza Tubing Hill in Summit Park).Up until today, Vail Resorts expected annual resort earnings from Canyons at about $15 million for 2014, and $25 million by 2017. But that was without PCMR factored in.

We’re all left to wonder what now?

PARK CITY MOUNTAIN RESORT TO PAY BOND; LET THE SKI SEASON BEGIN!

 

 

Park City Mountain Resort (PCMR) announced today it’s going to pay up. Judge Ryan Harris imposed a $17.5 million bond amount last week if the resort planned to operate for 2014/15. Well, get ready folks. the scheduled season opener is November 22, 2014; maybe even sooner if all of the epic snowfall forecasts ring true.

“Our goal has always been to keep PCMR open for the upcoming 2014/15 season and beyond,” said Jenni Smith, President and General Manager of PCMR. “Paying the bond ordered by the judge will provide our employees, the Park City community and our many guests the certainty they’ve been waiting for about our upcoming ski season.”

Under Powdr’s 20+ years of ownership, PCMR has grown into a world-class resort that continuously ranks among the top five resorts in North America. “I am very happy that the resort will be open this year,” Smith continued. “While the most important outcome today is that PCMR will be open for business, the bond payment is only a short term solution for the 2014/15 season. As such, we will continue working with Vail toward a reasonable and fair long-term solution.”

 

Powdr is one of the largest, privately owned and operated, lifestyle and mountain sports companies in North America with a portfolio of nine mountain resorts, four Woodward facilities and Outside Television. Locals had no doubts that they would post the bond.

 

Judge Tells PCMR To Pay $17.5 Million Bond

 

 

Oh Joy! We get to wait…again. It wouldn’t be a telenovela without a cliffhanger and the lawsuit between Park City Mountain Resort and Talisker Landholding LLC. wouldn’t be the biggest eviction case in the history of Utah without yet another delay.

Judge Ryan Harris ruled in 3rd District Court of Summit County this afternoon that PCMR will need to post a $17.5 million dollar bond if they wanted to operate this 2014/15 ski season. Instead of writing a check, paying, or filing for a surety bond right then and there, PCMR has a week to decide what they will do. “We need to post or advise the court [that they won’t be posting a bond],” said PCMR attorney Alan Sullivan. “We’re hopeful that there will be a ski season. That’s our objective. I will confer with my clients and comply with the court’s deadline.” Sullivan tap-danced around the questions of whether they would put up the bond and what he thinks of the judge’s decision.

The bond amount was tied to an estimate of PCMR’s annual rent but the two sides have been feuding (and mediating) over what that figure should be. Harris stipulated that none of his math is factual and that ultimate figures would be determined by factfinders such as an appellate judge, the jury or the parties themselves.

“The plaintiffs don’t have a right to remain on the land for free,” said Harris. The stay on his eviction is conditioned on the bond- an amount that should cover actual damages over the next ski season. He stated that the bond amount would include treble the damages as common in other landlord/tenant cases. “The amount is not punitive,” he said. “It exists to encourage a recalcitrant holdover tenant to vacate.”

As to the actual bond amount that PCMR needs to pay, it fell closer to what PCMR had proposed at last week’s hearing; an amount significantly less than Talisker’s $124 million request. The Judge said determining a value for the bond was “a difficult thing to do in this case.” He had to make a guesstimate as to the value of the PCMR land that Talisker owns then calculate what the rent would be based on that figure.

“Ski property doesn’t grow on trees,” said Harris. “[PCMR] is unique in and of itself.” He said you would need to determine what the property would lease for on the open market and factor in that the base and ski hill are divided. “The bond doesn’t need to be big enough so that the defendant can collect on the entire judgment. It only needs to cover damages that occur in the future as result of the plaintiff remaining on the property,” explained Harris.

With that said, he started with the $57.8 million value Vail proposed in their federal filings for the fair market value of the land then multiplied it by a capitalization rate of 10 percent to arrive at a rental price of $5.2 million per year. He then tripled that and included prejudgment interest and attorneys fee and ruled that PCMR needs to pay $17.5 million by next Friday or vacate.

He included a provision to extend the bond for another year to “make sure we don’t wind up back here. This is a ski town and folks need to know what’s going to happen.” The bond will remain in effect until April 30, 2015, and PCMR may extend the stay on the eviction to April 2016, if they pay an additional $19 million bond by March 2, 2015. “At some point the case will become final and we’ll need to discuss the posting of an appellate bond and that would be a much bigger amount than I am requiring now,” said Harris. “We’ll take this on a season by season basis until the case becomes final.”

The Judge also scheduled a telephone conference for 10:30 a.m. on September 30 to discuss a date for the appeal and whether PCMR still wants a jury trial. Let’s just hope that PCMR marked those dates in their calendar with a Sharpie this time.

Happy Endings in Park City Unlikely

I’ve been holding out hoping that this whole situation would work itself out; like kids on a playground finally figuring out they’ll have more fun if they stop arguing and get along. Then I would only get to write about the happy ending. I still might get to write about the happy ending but it won’t be anytime soon.

The hammer’s coming down this afternoon and either Park City Mountain Resort will be required to pack it in and make room for Vail Resorts to take over resort operations or 3rd District Court Judge Ryan Harris will stay VR’s eviction order to give PCMR time to appeal the May 21, 2014, decision.

Judge Harris heard motions from PCMR this spring, took time to mull over the evidence presented from both sides and ultimately ruled in favor of VR and partner Talisker Land Holdings, LLC. In short, Harris ruled the land lease between Talisker and PCMR expired in 2011. Last year, Talisker gave VR the right to operate both Canyons Resort and PCMR (pending the trial outcome) for the next 50 years for a whopping $25 million per year. With VR having no interest in extending PCMR’s lease or even issuing a new one, the Park City community has speculated on what will become of the business that just celebrated their 50th anniversary.

VR’s Rob Katz urged Powdr Corp. (owners of PCMR) to “do the right thing” and, what, walk away? Why is that the ‘right’ thing? That’s like someone who wants something from you calling you selfish because you won’t give it to them. That doesn’t make you selfish. It makes them selfish. It’s probably the legal thing, the pacifist thing, maybe even the smart thing to stop fighting this court battle. PCMR has the base area that will soon become a Woodward training camp for terrain park rats and they can lease to VR access to the rest of the mountain. Threats have been bantered around that PCMR will literally pull up stakes and leave the land bare of all usable chairlifts and lodges. According to last week’s court filing, PCMR plans to remove all of the Town, Crescent, King Con, Silverlode, Bonanza, McConkey’s, Pioneer, Eaglet and Silver Star lifts. Only the towers of Jupiter, Thaynes and Motherlode lifts would remain because they are “affixed to the land”. The resort estimates spending more than $7 million for the dismantling. There would be no 2014/15 ski season; instead there would be limited riding in the terrain park and off the lower terrain (Payday, Eagle and Three Kings would be modified for continued use). In the summer, there would still be hiking, biking, the Alpine Slide, an alpine coaster and a zip line.

 

Options

It doesn’t have to be all doom and gloom for Park City (although it’s more fun to pretend it does);

VR could buy the structures; if PCMR were willing to sell them.

VR could pay PCMR damages for the millions spent improving the resort during the time between when the lease had expired and VR spoke up about it… and then buy the structures off them.

VR could sign PCMR to a new lease (both sides say this will never happen)

PCMR could lease the equipment to VR and sell an easement to access the resort from PCMR’s parking lots.

PCMR could deny access and VR would be forced to sell tickets to both resorts from Canyons’ boundary and anyone with an Epic pass would have to hike (way) up past the Crescent and PayDay bases to catch a lift up the mountain.

VR spends millions installing new lifts after PCMR plays hardball and yanks everything from the upper mountain.

Am I leaving anything out? There are more moves here than a Chess World Championship.

 

Today, PCMR will ask Harris to postpone signing an eviction order so that the sides can figure out who owes what to whom. There’s back rent due to Talisker and damages owed to PCMR. Hopefully, those will offset each other. Both sides have already spent a small fortune on this power struggle. PCMR also wants Harris to wait until the outcome of their appeal to decide how to enforce an eviction order. Not to mention that if Harris doesn’t postpone and the eviction starts, like, yesterday, PCMR will have very little time to dismantle their facilities. Rumor has it that PCMR patrollers are on standby for swift demolition duties. VR says PCMR will have 60 days to vacate but that sounds optimistically generous under the circumstances.

 

Already, surrounding home and condo owners are contemplating an exit strategy. “We are looking at other real estate right now and thinking of selling [our Park City rental],” says one Utah local. “Not sure if ‘walking distance to Park City Micro Resort’ and ‘Woodward Park City at your doorstep” are much of a selling point. You can’t even get those dirtbags to buy lunch at Legacy Lodge.”

PCMR even hired an analyst to determine that if PCMR’s out-of-state skiers go someplace else, the local economy could take a $40-100 million hit, including a loss of more than 1,000 jobs. “The consequences are too dramatic if the court does allow the eviction to go forward,” Alan Sullivan, PCMR’s lead attorney, told the Park Record Newspaper.

 

It is now up to the Judge to decide.

 

Snowboarders Sue Alta Ski Area

It looks like snowboarders have finally decided they can’t take it anymore. Citing protection under the 14th Amendment, four boarders and a Utah nonprofit corporation calling itself Wasatch Equality Utah claim Alta has no right to ban them. They’re suing the only skiers-only area in the country that operates on federal land.

There have always been murmurs that Alta might allow snowboarding but still the Little Cottonwood Canyon resort holds fast to the ban. Any Alta local will tell you this is not only a frivolous suit but an insane one. More than half of the mountain involves significant traversing (when you glide and push along a narrow, flat path to get from A to B).

“Just because they lease the land doesn’t mean that they can go out and discriminate and say who can come here and say who can’t come here,” said Jonathan Schofield, an attorney at Parr, Brown, Gee & Loveless in Salt Lake City, on Fox13.

The argument is more than a bit flawed considering snowboarding isn’t a protected class like race, gender or religion. Makes for a weak case. Alta only needs to show they have a ‘rational basis’ for the ban; something easy for the resort and the Forest Service to prove.

Let’s look at some reasons –

  1. Alta’s layout sucks for boarding. The multi-mile traverses are impossible on a board; there are flats and uphills everywhere (imagine trying to get from Sugarloaf to Supreme without skis).
  2. Alta’s Winter Site Operation Plan approved by the Forest Service gives Alta the right to “exclude any type of skiing device that they deem creates an unnecessary risk to other skiers and/or the user of the device, or any device they deem causes undue damages to the quality of the snow, or is not consistent with the business management decisions.”
  3. Alta has its history to preserve. If any place holds the sole of skiing it’s Alta SKI Area.

The U.S. Forest Service grants Alta a special use permit and plaintiffs Drew Hicken, Skullcandy’s Rick Alden, pro snowboarder Bjorn Leines, and Richard Varg claim the resort‘s permit states that the public lands ‘shall remain open to the public for all lawful purpose.’ Apparently, it’s not open to them. The boarding trio allegedly had bought Alta tickets on Sunday but the lifties denied them access to the Collins lift. Alden was able to sneak past because of his splitboard. Two patrollers, however, confronted him when he got to the top and he was allowed to ride down-once- to get off the mountain safely.

The lawsuit showed up on Wednesday. Alta has not had a chance to review it so they have declined to comment right now.

1 17 18 19 20 21 26